From a geeky political perspective this is hardly a filibuster as the bill was never brought up for debate, but was simply shoved through the Senate with the hopes that everyone would just play nice and pass it through. Given our dire financial situation, Bunning figured that determining where these 10 billion would come from would be a good idea, but instead he got turned into a monster. Just today, I was watching CNN and a woman called in complaining that Congress is broken and that one man should not have the power to "hurt" millions of people. How is that for honest reporting?
Republicans if they were honest should have rallied behind Bunning and demanded that these 10 billion dollars are accounted for instead of simply borrowing. Mind you just several weeks ago Democrats barely got the debt ceiling raised by an additional 1.9 trillion and yet are continuing to borrow. In the off chance someone with enough guts calls them out on it, like Bunning did, he becomes vilified and turned into a scapegoat for angry Americans.
Although Bunning finally caved in, this incident serves as a stark reminder that nobody in Congress is serious about our financial plight and our growing deficit. It would be quite trivial in my humble opinion to match this spending with dollar for dollar spending cuts, yet our ruling classes are content with dispensing freebies and posturing in front of their constituency. What kind of seismic economic shift do we need in order for people to understand the gravity of the situation?


